KEY PLAN
donestructural_drawings_pkg_1_cede2c5e58c24d1b92ee5a813c5fab4c_p01_r01_key_plan
Plan6 objects · 9 measurements · 5 notes · 16 labels
This crop contains a key plan for a proposed skewed MUBR crossing at proposed chainage 64+412, together with a partial pile-supported foundation layout. The foundation layout shows two tapered pile groups, independent retaining walls at the outer ends, a median wall in PCC M15, and an expansion-joint centreline reference.
Objects · 6
| Mark | Object | No. | Shape | Material | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| proposed structure | 1 | skewed rectangular | Shown as a hatched crossing in the key plan; structure type is noted as MUBR. | ||
| pile | 40 | circular | Circular pile symbols are visible in two foundation groups. | ||
| skewed rectangular · ×2 | 2 | tapered trapezoidal | Two large skewed/tapered pile-supported foundation outlines are partially shown. | ||
| independent retaining wall | 2 | rectangular | One wall is called out at each visible end of the foundation arrangement. | ||
| median wall | 1 | rectangular | PCC M15 | Located between the two visible foundation groups. | |
| A1 | expansion joint | 1 | linear | Centre line is marked "C OF EXP. JOINT". |
Measurements · 9
| Measurement | Value | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed chainage | 64+412 | proposed structure |
| Proposed span | 2x40m | proposed structure |
| Skew | 30° | proposed structure |
| Chainage | 64+400 | RET. TOE WALL |
| Chainage | 64+500 | RET. TOE WALL |
| Dimension | 775 | foundation layout |
| Pile spacing dimension | 3750 | pile layout |
| Overall dimension | 16550 | foundation layout |
| Scale | 1:2000 | KEY PLAN |
Labels
KEY PLANPROPOSED CH: 64+412STRUCTURE TYPE MUBRPROPOSED SPAN 2x40mSKEW 30°PROPOSAL New ConstructionTO DEWASTO KHANDWAROWShipra RiverEarthen DrainAgriculture landNESW
Notes
- C OF EXP. JOINT
- INDEPENDENT RETAINING WALL
- MEDIAN WALL PCC M15
- RET. TOE WALL
- WING FOUNDATION LEVEL (partial)
3 of 3 changes applied1 matched, 2 skipped. · 25845 tokens
Applied to the reading
objects · foundation outline — “tapered trapezoidal · ×2” → “skewed rectangular · ×2”Dimension LF Agent: Each visible foundation cap has opposite parallel sides in this plan crop; no taper is drawn.measurements · Chainage = 64+400 — “Chainage = 64+400 — on RET. TOE WALL” → “Chainage = 64+400 — on key-plan alignment”Dimension LF Agent: 64+400 is a chainage printed along the alignment in the key plan, not a dimension of the separately leader-called-out RET. TOE WALL.measurements · Chainage = 64+500 — “Chainage = 64+500 — on RET. TOE WALL” → “Chainage = 64+500 — on key-plan alignment”Dimension LF Agent: 64+500 is likewise a chainage along the key-plan alignment; the RET. TOE WALL is identified by its own boxed callout.
Which agents were considered
- Reinforcement Agentskippednone of 25 keywords appear in this reading
- Concrete Agentskippednone of 20 keywords appear in this reading
- Dimension LF Agentrankeyword "span", "spacing", "skew" in the reading
What each agent cost
- Dimension LF Agent3 proposedThe two foundation outlines are drawn as skewed rectangular/parallelogram pile caps, not tapered trapezoids. The 64+400 and 64+500 entries are chainages shown along the key-plan alignment, while the RET. TOE WALL labels are separate callouts. · openai/gpt-5.6-terra-pro · 25845 tokens · 41.4s
openai/gpt-5.6-terra-pro · 27797 tokens · 43.0s